4.4 Article

Ultrasensitivity in independent multisite systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages 977-999

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00285-013-0727-x

Keywords

Multisite system; Phosphorylation; Signal transduction; Ultrasensitivity; Cooperativity; Allostery; Bacterial chemotaxis

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMS-1122478, 1129008]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1129008] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1129008] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multisite modifications are widely recognized as an essential feature of many switch-like responses in signal transduction. It is usually assumed that the modification of one site directly or indirectly increases the rate of modification of neighboring sites. In this paper we provide a new set of assumptions for a multisite system to become highly ultrasensitive even in the absence of cooperativity or allostery. We assume that the individual sites are modified independently of each other, and that protein activity is an ultrasensitive function of the fraction of modified sites. These assumptions are particularly useful in the context of multisite systems with a large (8+) number of sites. We estimate the apparent Hill coefficient of the dose responses in the sequential and nonsequential cases, highlight their different qualitative properties, and discuss a formula to approximate dose responses in the nonsequential case. As an example we describe a model of bacterial chemotaxis that features robust ultrasensitivity and perfect adaptation over a wide range of ligand concentrations, based on non-allosteric multisite behavior at the level of receptors and flagella. We also include a model of the inactivation of the yeast pheromone protein Ste5 by cell cycle proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available