4.2 Article

Fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: is less invasive antenatal management safe?

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 564-567

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2010.511333

Keywords

Alloimmune thrombocytopenia; intracranial hemorrhage; fetal and neonatal thrombocytopenia; IVIG; prenatal management

Funding

  1. French alloimmune study Group
  2. GROG (Research Group in Obstetrics and Gynecology)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Material and methods. aEuro integral This retrospective study in France includes 23 pregnancies in 21 women who had a previous thrombocytopenic infant due to anti HPA-1a alloimmunization. All pregnant women received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment, with or without corticosteroids. Fetal blood sampling (FBS) was performed before any therapy (four cases) or during pregnancy (nine cases). Results. aEuro integral Infants whose mother received treatment had a significantly higher neonatal platelet count than the corresponding sibling (p == 0.003). In eight cases, therapy was started late during pregnancy. In three cases, treatment was discontinued 3 or 4 weeks before birth, and this was associated with a poorer result. No in utero intracranial hemorrhage was recorded in the infants for whom maternal therapy continued to term. Adverse effects were not observed in any case. All babies were delivered by cesarean even when FBS was performed. One emergency cesarean was performed for fetal bradycardia after FBS. Conclusion. aEuro integral This study confirmed that maternal therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin for fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia gives satisfactory results. It also showed that a less invasive approach, especially a reduction in the number of fetal blood samples, is possible without deleterious consequences. This observation suggests also to start IVIG early during pregnancy and to continue treatment up to delivery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available