4.2 Article

Brittleness index and seismic rock physics model for anisotropic tight-oil sandstone reservoirs

Journal

APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 11-22

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11770-014-0478-0

Keywords

brittleness index; tight-oil sandstone reservoirs; seismic rock physics model; brittleness sensitivity; anisotropy

Funding

  1. National 973 project [2014CB239006, 2011CB202402]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41104069, 41274124]
  3. Sinopec project [KJWX2014-05]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [R1401005A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brittleness analysis becomes important when looking for sweet spots in tight-oil sandstone reservoirs. Hence, appropriate indices are required as accurate brittleness evaluation criteria. We construct a seismic rock physics model for tight-oil sandstone reservoirs with vertical fractures. Because of the complexities in lithology and pore structure and the anisotropic characteristics of tight-oil sandstone reservoirs, the proposed model is based on the solid components, pore connectivity, pore type, and fractures to better describe the sandstone reservoir microstructure. Using the model, we analyze the brittleness sensitivity of the elastic parameters in an anisotropic medium and establish a new brittleness index. We show the applicability of the proposed brittleness index for tight-oil sandstone reservoirs by considering the brittleness sensitivity, the rock physics response characteristics, and cross-plots. Compared with conventional brittleness indexes, the new brittleness index has high brittleness sensitivity and it is the highest in oil-bearing brittle zones with relatively high porosity. The results also suggest that the new brittleness index is much more sensitive to elastic properties variations, and thus can presumably better predict the brittleness characteristics of sweet spots in tight-oil sandstone reservoirs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available