4.6 Article

Commonly Used Porous Building Materials: Geomorphic Pore Structure and Fluid Transport

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 1803-1812

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000706

Keywords

Porous media; Construction materials; Permeability; Porous building materials; X-ray; Computed tomography; Transport; Permeability

Funding

  1. Defense Threat Reduction Agency [HDTRA1-08-C-0021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge of microscopic geomorphic structures is critical to understanding transport processes in porous building materials. X-ray scans were obtained of a variety of commonly used porous building materials to both qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate their pore structures. The specimens included natural materials (two sandstones and a limestone) and engineered materials (three types of concretes and a brick). Scanned images were processed to reconstruct the geomorphic structures of these materials. Random walk analyses were performed on the reconstructed pore structures to estimate macroscopic transport properties (including tortuosity, specific surface, and permeability). The effective porosity and permeability of these materials were also experimentally determined and compared to computed values. Calibration of the threshold pixel value used in the postprocessing of X-ray images against measured effective porosity appears to be a more appropriate method of selecting this value than the typical approach, which employs selection based solely on observed histograms. The resulting permeabilities computed by using a calibrated threshold pixel value compare better with the measured permeabilities. This study also demonstrates that the relatively homogeneous and heterogeneous pore structures associated with the natural and engineered building materials under investigation can be captured by X-ray tomography. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available