4.5 Article

Clinical and imaging markers in premotor LRRK2 G2019S mutation carriers

Journal

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 1170-1176

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.08.007

Keywords

Parkinson; LRRK2; Genetic; Transcranial ultrasound; Substantia nigra

Funding

  1. Michael J Fox Foundation
  2. Marato TV3

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Substantia nigra hyperechogenicity (SN+) has been proposed as a risk marker of Parkinson's disease (PD). Asymptomatic LRRK2 mutation carriers (aLRRIC2+), at high risk for developing PD, provide an opportunity for the study of preclinical biomarkers. Objective: To assess SN echogenicity and other echographic features in LRRK2 G2019S carriers and their clinical and imaging correlates. Methods: Transcranial sonography was performed in 26 LRRK2 G2019S PD patients, 50 first-degree relatives, 31 idiopathic PD (IPD) patients and 26 controls. SN echogenicity and other echographic features were assessed in all study subjects. Dopamine transporter imaging (DAT-SPECT) was performed in 29 first-degree relatives. Results: 75% of the LRRK2-PD and 87.5% of the IPD showed SN+ (p = 0.087). aLRRK2+ had a higher frequency of SN+ than non carriers (583% vs. 25%, p = 0.039) and controls (58.3% vs. 12.5%; p = 0.002) and had a larger area of SN echogenicity than non carriers (p = 0.030) and controls (p < 0.001). The width of the third ventricle was significantly lower in LRRK2-PD than in IPD (1.9 mm [1.38; 2.751 vs. 3.0 mm [23; 531; p = 0.003). Four out of 5 (80%) of the aLRRK2+ with an abnormal DAT-SPECT and four of the 5 (80%) of those with REM sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) had SN+. Conclusions: SN+ is very frequent in LRRK2-PD and aLRRK2+. Most aLRRK2 with possible surrogate markers of PD such as abnormal DAT-SPECT or RBD, also had SN+, which supports that this echofeature might be a marker of PD in these asymptomatic population. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available