4.3 Article

Non-interacting hard ferromagnetic L10 FePt nanoparticles embedded in a carbon matrix

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
Volume 21, Issue 45, Pages 18331-18338

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1jm13469h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MIUR-PRIN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monodispersed ferromagnetic FePt nanoparticles, partially ordered in the L1(0) phase, were directly prepared without further annealing by high temperature synthesis (approximate to 300 degrees C) involving poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) and Triton X-100 as protective agent and reaction solvent respectively. Depending on the synthesis conditions, nanoparticles with average sizes ranging from 5 to 7 nm and coercive fields reaching 0.1 T at 300 K were obtained, but they invariably aggregate by magnetic dipolar interaction. By increasing the solvent viscosity (using PEG 600), 5 nm superparamagnetic nanoparticles are embedded in an amorphous matrix derived from solvent condensation/decomposition, thus avoiding aggregation. Nanoparticles are then completely converted to the hard tetragonal L1(0) phase, preserving the original size, by annealing in a vacuum at higher temperatures that, at the same time, transform the matrix into amorphous carbon. Annealing at 650 degrees C for 3 h leads to coercive fields of about 0.25 T at RT and 1.3 T at 5 K (without reaching the saturation magnetization) and to a peculiar squeezing of the hysteresis loops. Subsequent treatments at higher temperatures induce a further shrinking of the loop and a reduction of the coercive field. The possible explanation takes into account that, by raising the annealing temperature, an increasing number of nanoparticles becomes free to rotate inside the matrix, aligning like nano-compasses with the applied magnetic field. However a fraction of nanoparticles remains still locked to the matrix, generating a superimposed magnetically hard contribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available