4.4 Article

Comparative study on leachate in closed landfill sites: focusing on seasonal variations

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 174-182

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10163-008-0246-9

Keywords

Landfill; Leachate characteristics; Infiltration; Seasonal variation; Final capping

Funding

  1. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries (MAFRA), Republic of Korea [1-4-1-09-10-1-1] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article is intended to provide background information on leachate management in closed landfill sites based on a comparison of two landfill sites and the identification of leachate characteristics depending on the final cover and the season. Site S is older and has no final cover, while site J is younger and has final capping. The results of leachate analysis from the two landfills show that the biological oxygen demand to chemical oxygen demand ratio decreases below 0.1 to the range 0.05-0.07 for site S, whereas the ratio at site J was in the range 0.08-0.55. The inorganic nitrogen concentration was in the range 169.9-386.1 mg/l with an average of 265.2 mg/l at site S. Ammonia nitrogen accounted for 98.9% of the total nitrogen. The absence of a final cover on closed landfill sites may contribute to the stabilization of such landfills due to flushing. The nitrogen content at landfill S dropped in the summer, whereas it decreased in the fall at site J. A higher fluctuation in the pollutant levels of organic matters and nitrogen at the younger landfill site was observed, compared to the older site, even though the younger site had final capping. Therefore, intensive leachate management should be arranged at the early stages after closing for proper treatment. Specifically, nitrogen management of leachate is a critical factor in treatment operations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available