4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Swimming for survival: A role of phytoplankton motility in a stratified turbulent environment

Journal

JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS
Volume 70, Issue 3-4, Pages 248-262

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2006.07.008

Keywords

phytoplankton motility; tidal mixing; shelf sea; phototaxis; thermocline; turbulence modelling; Lagrangian modelling

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C516079/1, pol010006] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. NERC [pol010006] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate a role for vertical migration in stratified coastal water, where the swimming speed is generally significantly less than the typical turbulent fluctuations in a tidally-mixed bottom layer. In our modelling approach we use a k-epsilon turbulence model to describe the physical forcing, a Lagrangian random walk model to describe the vertical displacement of individual cells in response to turbulence and due to cell motility, and a phytoplankton growth model to direct the swimming behaviour of the phytoplankton according to their light and nutrient requirements. The model results show how the cells form a stable subsurface chlorophyll maximum (SCM) at the base of the thermocline where episodic tidal turbulence causes erosion of part of the SCM biomass into the bottom mixed layer (BML). We then focus on the question of whether an ability to swim (weakly, compared to typical bottom layer turbulent intensities) provides any advantage by allowing return to the SCM. Our results show that tidal turbulence in the BML helps both motile and neutrally-buoyant cells by periodically pushing them into the base of the thermocline. Motile cells then have the advantage that they can swim further into the thermocline towards higher light which also reduces the likelihood of being remixed back into the BML. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available