4.3 Article

Grid-free powder averages: On the applications of the Fokker-Planck equation to solid state NMR

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Volume 235, Issue -, Pages 121-129

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.07.011

Keywords

NMR; MAS; SLE; Fokker-Planck equation; State space restriction

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/H003789/1, EP/J013080/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/H003789/2, EP/F065205/1, EP/H003789/1, EP/J013080/1, EP/F065205/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J013080/1, EP/H003789/1, EP/F065205/2, EP/H003789/2, EP/F065205/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0843520] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrate that Fokker-Planck equations in which spatial coordinates are treated on the same conceptual level as spin coordinates yield a convenient formalism for treating magic angle spinning NMR experiments. In particular, time dependence disappears from the background Hamiltonian (sample spinning is treated as an interaction), spherical quadrature grids are avoided completely (coordinate distributions are a part of the formalism) and relaxation theory with any linear diffusion operator is easily adopted from the Stochastic Liouville Equation theory. The proposed formalism contains Floquet theory as a special case. The elimination of the spherical averaging grid comes at the cost of increased matrix dimensions, but we show that this can be mitigated by the use of state space restriction and tensor train techniques. It is also demonstrated that low correlation order basis sets apparently give accurate answers in powder-averaged MAS simulations, meaning that polynomially scaling simulation algorithms do exist for a large class of solid state NMR experiments. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available