4.3 Article

Perfusion Computed Tomography as Functional Biomarker in Randomized Run-In Study of Bevacizumab and Everolimus in Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors

Journal

PANCREAS
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 190-197

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000255

Keywords

neuroendocrine tumors; antiangiogenic therapy; mTOR; VEGF

Funding

  1. Novartis Oncology
  2. Genentech
  3. Novartis
  4. General Electric

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the antitumor activity of everolimus and bevacizumab among patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors and to assess perfusion computed tomography (CT) as a potential functional biomarker. Methods: Patients with low-to intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors received one 3-week cycle of 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab on day 1 or 10 mg of everolimus daily. Subsequent cycles consisted of the combination of both drugs. Perfusion CTs were performed at baseline and at the end of cycles 1 and 3. Results: Therapy decreased blood flow (BF) proportional to baseline measurements. Bevacizumab was associated with a 44% decrease in BF (P < 0.0001). After the addition of everolimus, a further 29% decrease (P = 0.02) in BF was observed. Everolimus alone was associated with 13% increase in mean transit time (P = 0.02). Clinical activity was demonstrated, with a confirmed response rate of 21% and a median progression-free survival of 14.6 (95% confidence interval, 13.0-16.1) months. Pretreatment tumor permeability surface (P = 0.009), post-treatment mean transit time (P = 0.003), percent reduction in BF (P = 0.03), and percent reduction in blood volume (P = 0.002) were associated with best percent reduction in tumor diameters. Conclusions: Bevacizumab and everolimus demonstrated antitumor activity. Perfusion CT is a promising tool for the development of antiangiogenic strategies and for the selection of patients who are likely to benefit from therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available