4.2 Article

Most Parents Do Not Think Receiving Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Would Encourage Sexual Activity in Their Children

Journal

JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 179-184

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181d41806

Keywords

human papillomavirus; vaccine; questionnaire; sexual intercourse

Funding

  1. residual grant funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To determine whether parents think receiving human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine encourages sexual activity in their children. Materials and Methods. Parents of children 9 to 17 years old living in Georgia and South Carolina completed a 53-item questionnaire that evaluated their opinions about the HPV vaccine and their feelings about whether receiving it encourages sexual intercourse in their children. Fisher exact tests and t tests were used to identify differences between groups. Results. Participants tended to be white, protestant mothers, 30 to 39 years old with private health insurance. Most parents (301/322, 93.5%) did not believe receiving the HPV vaccine would encourage their child to have sex. Parents who believed the vaccine would encourage sex were more likely to have 15- to 17-year-old children (76% vs 37%, p = .0007), were 40 years or older (62% vs 35%, p = .019), have religious objections to vaccines in general (10% vs 0.3%, p = .01) and the HPV vaccine (14% vs 2%, p = .02), and believed the vaccine would not reduce the risk of cervical cancer in their daughters (50% vs 9%, p = .001). Conclusions. Most parents do not think the HPV vaccine would actually encourage sexual activity in their children. Therefore, health care providers can be less hesitant in recommending the vaccine to young sexually naive girls. Additional education should help improve overall parental understanding about the HPV vaccine and, consequently, vaccination rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available