Journal
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 594-600Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.05.007
Keywords
Electrostatic charge; Brush discharge; Polymer powders; Agitation; Mixing; Ionizer
Categories
Funding
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
- National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health of Japan
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Powder mixing is often carried out in the chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Electrostatic charges generated on polymer powders during mixing may lead to electrostatic problems due to the poor conductivity of those powders. In this study, we investigated the electrostatic charges, surface potential, and apparent volume resistivity of sample powders using a simple mixing device utilizing the Faraday cup method. To neutralize the charged powders, we also applied an AC-type ionizer in the mixing study. A commercial polyethylene powder with a mean particle size of 585 mu m was tested in this experiment. The charge-to-mass ratios at the end of 600 s of mixing were -0.075 nC/g at 295 rpm agitation speed, -0.21 nC/g at 495 rpm, and -0.31 nC/g at 660 rpm, high enough to cause electrostatic agglomeration and adhesion. The electric fields based on the surface potential on the powders were several hundreds of V/cm, too small to give rise to brush discharge. The apparent volume resistivity of powders estimated by a simple measurement system is 1.0 x 10(16) Omega m, in reasonable agreement with that acquired by the conventional test cell method (5.9 x 10(15) Omega m). The charging level on the polymer powders was reduced with an AC-ionizer. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available