4.6 Article

Integration of QTL and bioinformatic tools to identify candidate genes for triglycerides in mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
Volume 52, Issue 9, Pages 1672-1682

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M011130

Keywords

quantitative trait loci; gene expression; genetics

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL-077796, HL-081162]
  2. American Heart Association
  3. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute [CA-034196]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To identify genetic loci influencing lipid levels, we performed quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis between inbred mouse strains MRL/MpJ and SM/J, measuring triglyceride levels at 8 weeks of age in F2 mice fed a chow diet. We identified one significant QTL on chromosome (Chr) 15 and three suggestive QTL on Chrs 2, 7, and 17. We also carried out microarray analysis on the livers of parental strains of 282 F2 mice and used these data to find cis-regulated expression QTL. We then narrowed the list of candidate genes under significant QTL using a toolbox of bioinformatic resources, including haplotype analysis; parental strain comparison for gene expression differences and nonsynonymous coding single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP); cis-regulated eQTL in livers of F2 mice; correlation between gene expression and phenotype; and conditioning of expression on the phenotype. We suggest Slc25a7 as a candidate gene for the Chr 7 QTL and, based on expression differences, five genes (Polr3 h, Cyp2d22, Cyp2d26, Tspo, and Ttll12) as candidate genes for Chr 15 QTL. This study shows how bioinformatics can be used effectively to reduce candidate gene lists for QTL related to complex traits.-Leduc, M. S., R. S. Hageman, R. A. Verdugo, S-W. Tsaih, K. Walsh, G. A. Churchill, and B. Paigen. Integration of QTL and bioinformatic tools to identify candidate genes for triglycerides in mice. J. Lipid Res. 2011. 52: 1672-1682.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available