4.4 Article

Safety of Lumbar Spine Radiofrequency Procedures in the Presence of Posterior Pedicle Screws: Technical Report of a Cadaver Study

Journal

PAIN MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 877-880

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/pme.12678

Keywords

Facet Radiofrequency; Pedicle Screws; Radiofrequency; Radiofrequency Neurotomy; Spine Instrumentation

Funding

  1. CTSA from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) [UL1 TR000135]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo determine whether the thermal energy associated with lumbar spine radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) performed near titanium and stainless steel pedicle screws is conducted to the pedicle screws or adjacent tissues, or both, thus introducing potential for thermal damage to those tissues. DesignCadaver study. SettingCadaver laboratory equipped with fluoroscopy, surgical spine implements, and radiofrequency generator. SubjectsNo live human subject; a fresh frozen (and thawed) cadaver torso was used for the study. MethodsTitanium and stainless steel pedicle screws were placed in the lumbar spine of a fresh frozen cadaver torso with real-time fluoroscopic guidance. Conventional RFN cannula placement was performed at the level of pedicle screws and a control (nonsurgically altered) lumbar level. Neurotomy was performed with conventional radiofrequency lesioning parameters. Temperatures were recorded at multiple sites through thermistor probes. ResultsDirect contact of the radiofrequency cannula with the pedicle screws during conventional RFN produced a substantial increase in temperature in the surrounding soft tissues. A small increase in temperature occurred at the same sites at the control level. ConclusionsTitanium and stainless steel pedicle screws are capable of sustaining large increases in temperature when the radiofrequency probe comes in contact with the screw. These results are suggestive that pedicle screws could serve as a possible source of tissue heating and thermal injury during RFN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available