4.5 Article

Clinical Characteristics of the Responders to Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Korean Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes

Journal

JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 881-887

Publisher

KOREAN ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.6.881

Keywords

Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Diabetes Mellitus; Type 2; Hemoglobin A; Glycosylated; Clinical Efficacy

Funding

  1. Innovative Research Institute for Cell Therapy, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [A062260]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated characteristics associated with the efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes. We reviewed medical records of 477 patients who had taken sitagliptin or vildagliptin longer than 40 weeks. Response to DPP4i was evaluated with HbA1c change after therapy (Delta HbA1c). The Student's t-test between good responders (GR:Delta HbA1c > 1.0%) and poor responders (PR:Delta HbA1c < 0.5%), a correlation analysis among clinical parameters, and a linear multivariate regression analysis were performed. The mean age was 60 yr, duration of diabetes 11 yr and HbA1c was 8.1%. Baseline fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c, C-peptide, and creatinine were significantly higher in the GR compared to the PR. Duration of diabetes, FPG, HbA1c, C-peptide and creatinine were significantly correlated with HbA1c. In the multivariate analysis, age (r(2) = 0.006), duration of diabetes (r(2) = 0.019), Delta HbA1c (r(2) = 0.296), and creatinine levels (r(2) = 0.024) were independent predictors for the response to DPP4i. Body mass index and insulin resistance were not associated with the response to DPP4i. In conclusion, better response to DPP4i would be expected in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes who have higher baseline HbA1c and creatinine levels with shorter duration of diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available