4.2 Article

Hemostatic Efficacy of EVARREST™, Fibrin Sealant Patch vs. TachoSil® in a Heparinized Swine Spleen Incision Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 360-365

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/08941939.2014.941444

Keywords

EVARREST (TM); Fibrin Sealant Patch; oxidized regenerated cellulose; ORC; polyglactin 910; TachoSil R (R); hemostasis

Categories

Funding

  1. Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ [08876]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: First-generation single-component hemostats such as oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC), fibrin, collagen, and gelatin have evolved into second and third generations of combination hemostats. Objective: This study compares two FDA approved products, EVARRESTTM, Fibrin Sealant Patch, a hemostat comprised of amatrix of nonwoven polyglactin 910 embedded in ORC coated with human fibrinogen and thrombin to TachoSil (R) medicated sponge, an equine collagen pad coated with human fibrinogen and thrombin. Materials and Methods: Swine were anticoagulated with heparin to 3X their baseline activated clotting time and a 15 mm long x 3 mm deep incision was made to create a consistent moderate bleeding pattern. Test material was then applied to the wound site and compressed manually for 3 min with just enough pressure to prevent continued bleeding. Hemostatic effectiveness was evaluated at 3 min and 10 min. Results: At 3 min, the hemostasis success rate was 86% in the EVARRESTTM group and 0% in the TachoSil (R) group, p < .0001. The overall success rate at 10 min was 100% with EVARRESTTM and 4% with TachoSil (R), p < .0001. Adhesive failure, in which the test material did not stick to the tissue, occurred in 96% of TachoSil (R) sites. In contrast, 100% of the EVARRESTTM applications adhered to the test site. Conclusions: EVARRESTTM, Fibrin Sealant Patch demonstrated greater wound adhesion and more effective hemostasis than TachoSil (R). Adhesive failure was the primary failure mode for TachoSil (R) in thismodel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available