Journal
JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/4/05/T05001
Keywords
Large detector systems for particle and astroparticle physics; Beam-line instrumentation (beam position and profile monitors; beam-intensity monitors; bunch length monitors)
Categories
Funding
- STFC [ST/H000992/1, PP/E003192/1, ST/H001735/1, PP/E003346/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H000992/1, PP/E003346/1, ST/H001735/1, PP/E003192/1, ST/H001735/1 MICE/UKNF] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This report summarises the conclusions from the detector group of the International Scoping Study of a future Neutrino Factory and Super-Beam neutrino facility. The baseline detector options for each possible neutrino beam are defined as follows: 1. A very massive (Megaton) water Cherenkov detector is the baseline option for a sub-GeV Beta Beam and Super Beam facility. 2. There are a number of possibilities for either a Beta Beam or Super Beam (SB) medium energy facility between 1-5 GeV. These include a totally active scintillating detector (TASD), a liquid argon TPC or a water Cherenkov detector. 3. A 100 kton magnetized iron neutrino detector (MIND) is the baseline to detect the wrong sign muon final states (golden channel) at a high energy (20-50 GeV) neutrino factory from muon decay. A 10 kton hybrid neutrino magnetic emulsion cloud chamber detector for wrong sign tau detection (silver channel) is a possible complement to MIND, if one needs to resolve degeneracies that appear in the delta-theta(13) parameter space.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available