4.2 Article

The species richness of click beetles in ancient pasture woodland benefits from a high level of sun exposure

Journal

JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 307-318

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-012-9511-2

Keywords

Canopy openness; Coleoptera; Elateridae; Veteran trees; Forest biodiversity; Saproxylic insect; Guild; Functional group; Larval development

Funding

  1. Lesak, o.s. [PPK-2a/24/10]
  2. CZ Ministry of Environment MSM of VUKOZ, v.v.i. [6293359101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forests support high concentrations of species and beetles in particular are often used to evaluate forest biodiversity. Ancient pasture woodlands are facing a major decline in Europe mainly due to the abandonment of traditional management and subsequent succession. We studied click beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in one of the largest central-European remnants of pasture woodland in Lany Game Park (Czech Republic) using flight interception traps placed at standing veteran trees. The gradient of sun-exposure, circumference of stem, height and vitality of tree and tree species were studied in relation to the species richness of click beetles and their ecological groups. Total species richness reached nearly one half of the recently documented fauna in the study area and species accumulations showed us that the majority of species were represented. Most species preferred solitary trees in sun-exposed habitats and avoided shaded trees in closed canopies. The same results were obtained for ecological groups, such as saproxylic and non-saproxylic species, functional groups and guilds. Our results showed that the species richness of one of the most ecologically diverse beetle families, click beetles, benefits from a high level of sun exposure. Thus, the long spatial and temporal continuity of sun-exposed veteran trees could be a good predictor for sustainable forest management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available