4.6 Article

Class II MHC/Peptide Interaction in Leishmania donovani Infection: Implications in Vaccine Design

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 192, Issue 12, Pages 5873-5880

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302970

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, India
  2. Host Interactome Analysis: Understanding the Role of Host Molecule in Parasitic Infection (HOPE) [BSC 0114]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We show that Leishmania donovani-infectedmacrophages (M Phi s) are capable of stimulating MHC class II (MHC-II)-restricted T cells at 6 h of infection. At 48 h, infected M Phi s (I-M Phi s) failed to stimulate MHC-II-restricted T cells but not MHC class I-restricted ones, in contrast to normal M Phi s. Such I-M Phi s could stimulate T cells at a higher Ag concentration, indicating that general Ag processing and trafficking of peptide-MHC-II complexes are not defective. Analysis of the kinetic parameters, like k(on) and k(off), showed that peptide-MHC-II complex formation is compromised in I-M Phi s compared with normal M Phi s. This indicates interference in loading of the cognate peptide to MHC-II, which may be due to the presence of a noncognate molecule. This notion received support from the finding that exposure of I-M Phi s to low pH or treatment with 2-(1-adamantyl)-ethanol, a molecule that favors peptide exchange, led to T cell activation. When treated with 2-(1-adamantyl)-ethanol, splenocytes from 8 wk-infected BALB/c mice showed significantly higher antileishmanial T cell expansion in vitro compared with untreated controls. Hence, it is tempting to speculate that high, but not low, concentrations of cognate peptide may favor peptide exchange in I-M Phi s, leading to expansion of the antileishmanial T cell repertoire. The results suggest that a high Ag dose may overcome compromised T cell responses in visceral leishmaniasis, and this has an important implication in therapeutic vaccine design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available