4.6 Article

CD16 Regulates TRIF-Dependent TLR4 Response in Human Monocytes and Their Subsets

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 188, Issue 8, Pages 3584-3593

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100244

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Biomedical Research Council, A*STAR
  2. Fondos Investigacion Sanitaria
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  4. Fundacion Mutua Madrilena de Automovilistica

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blood monocytes recognize Gram-negative bacteria through the TLR4, which signal via MyD88- and TRIF-dependent pathway to trigger an immune-inflammatory response. However, a dysregulated inflammatory response by these cells often leads to severe pathologies such as sepsis. We investigated the role of CD16 in the regulation of human monocyte response to Gram-negative endotoxin and sepsis. Blood monocytes from sepsis patients demonstrated an upregulation of several TRIF-dependent genes as well as a selective expansion of CD16-expressing (CD16(+)) monocytes. Gene expression and biochemical studies revealed CD16 to regulate the TRIF-dependent TLR4 pathway in monocytes by activating Syk, IFN regulatory factor 3, and STAT1, which resulted in enhanced expression of IFNB, CCL5, and CXCL10. CD16 also upregulated the expression of IL-1R-associated kinase M and IL-1 receptor antagonist, which are negative regulators of the MyD88-dependent pathway. CD16 overexpression or small interfering RNA knockdown in monocytes confirmed the above findings. Interestingly, these results were mirrored in the CD16(+) monocyte subset isolated from sepsis patients, providing an in vivo confirmation to our findings. Collectively, the results from the current study demonstrate CD16 as a key regulator of the TRIF-dependent TLR4 pathway in human monocytes and their CD16-expressing subset, with implications in sepsis. The Journal of Immunology, 2012, 188: 3584-3593.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available