4.6 Article

Cellular Competition Independent of BAFF/B Lymphocyte Stimulator Results in Low Frequency of an Autoreactive Clonotype in Mature Polyclonal B Cell Compartments

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 187, Issue 1, Pages 37-46

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003924

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01AI038965]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The peripheral B cell prosurvival cytokine BAFF/B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) has been proposed to participate in the regulation of immunological tolerance. Selective elimination or reconstitution of B cells expressing transgene-encoded, autoreactive BCRs upon systemic BLyS depletion or supplementation, respectively, was observed in two separate studies. Such findings led to a model positing a higher dependency of autoreactive B cells on BLyS. We tested this model by exploiting two targeted IgH transgenic mice (H chain knock-in [HKI]) that produce large numbers of follicular (FO) B cells that are either weakly or strongly autoreactive with nuclear autoantigens. Even though HKI B cells do not exhibit classical features of anergy, we found that mature, naive, autoreactive HKI B cells are outcompeted for representation in the periphery by a polyclonal B cell population. However, this is not due to a higher dependency of HKI B cells on BLyS for survival. Additionally, excess BLyS does not rescue HKI B cells from selective elimination. These findings suggest that some autoreactive FO B cells can fully develop while in competition with non-autoreactive cells for BLyS, but remain at a competitive disadvantage for other trophic factors that regulate peripheral stability. As such, our data indicate the existence of peripheral tolerance mechanisms that regulate the frequency of autoreactive FO B cells independent of the BLyS pathway. The Journal of Immunology, 2011, 187: 37-46.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available