4.6 Article

Cryptic Epitopes Induce High-Titer Humoral Immune Response in Patients with Cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 185, Issue 5, Pages 3095-3102

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902166

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Research Institute (New York, NY)
  2. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research (New York, NY)
  3. Krebsliga Zurich (Zurich, Switzerland)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In search of novel markers for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of cancer, screening of rcDNA expression libraries with patient's sera has been established as a valuable tool for identification of cancer-specific Ags. Interestingly, besides the expected humoral responses to annotated proteins, patients with cancer were frequently found to have serum Abs that bind to peptides without homology to known proteins. So far, the nature of these unconventional epitopes and their possible significance in tumor immunology have never been thoroughly investigated. In our study, we specifically analyzed humoral immune response toward such peptides in patients with pancreatic or breast cancer using yeast-displayed cDNA expression libraries derived from tumor tissue. A detailed analysis of the identified peptides revealed that they originated from translation of sequences outside annotated open reading frames and may derive from the use of alternative start codons or from DNA indel mutations. In several cases, the corresponding mRNA templates have a known association with cancer. In a final analysis, we were able to detect one of these tumor Ags in cancer tissue arrays by a selected Fab-Ab. We conclude that cryptic epitopes may elicit specific humoral immune responses in patients with cancer and thus play a role in immunologic surveillance. Due to the high prevalence of immune responses against some of the peptides, they may also be valuable markers for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, or therapy monitoring. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 185: 3095-3102.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available