4.8 Article

Effect of dairy manure to switchgrass co-digestion ratio on methane production and the bacterial community in batch anaerobic digestion

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages 249-257

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.078

Keywords

Co-digestion; Methane production; Bacterial community; Switchgrass; Dairy manure

Funding

  1. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China [2012BAD14B06]
  2. National 863 Program of China [2012AA101802]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51408600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The methane yield and microbial community resulting from co-digestion of dairy manure and switchgrass at different mixing ratios [4:0, 3:1, 2:2, 1:3, and 0:4 based on total solids (TS) content] were evaluated. The results indicated that switchgrass is an excellent feedstock for biogas production when co-digested with dairy manure. Mono-digestion of a high dose (>4% TS) of switchgrass led to volatile fatty acid accumulation and process failure, whereas co-digestion of switchgrass and dairy manure could increase the buffering capacity and improve the fermentation efficiency. The optimal mixture ratio of dairy manure and switchgrass was 2:2, with a methane yield that was 39% higher than that obtained by digestion of the individual substrates. The added amount of 8% TS at the 2:2 ratio achieved the highest methane yield of 158.6 mL/g VS, which corresponded to a 1.3-fold increase in the volumetric productivity of methane compared to mono-digestion of 4% TS switchgrass. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and clone library analyses showed significant differences in the bacterial community resulting from the different co-substrate ratios. Planctomycetes (28%), Chloroflexi (24%), and Bacteroidetes (24%) were the dominant phyla in digesters with a co-substrate ratio of 2:2. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available