4.6 Article

Modulation of p38 MAPK Activity in Regulatory T Cells after Tolerance with Anti-DNA Ig Peptide in (NZB X NZW)F1 Lupus Mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 182, Issue 12, Pages 7415-7421

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0804214

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AR53239, A1065645, AR054034, AR42200, AI46776]
  2. Arthritis Foundation Southern California Chapter
  3. Arthritis National Research Foundation
  4. ERC-Starting [202579]
  5. JDRF-Telethon [GJT08004]
  6. Fondazione Telethon Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Treatment of (NZB x NZW)F-1 (NZB/W) lupus-prone mice with the anti-DNA Ig-based peptide pConsensus prolongs the survival of treated animals and effectively delays the appearance of autoantibodies and glomerulonephritis. We have previously shown that part of these protective effects associated with the induction of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) that suppressed autoantibody responses. Because the effects of pConsensus appeared secondary to qualitative rather than quantitative changes in Tregs, we investigated the molecular events induced by tolerance in Tregs and found that signaling pathways including ZAP70, p27, STAT1, STAT3, STAT6, SAPK, ERK, and JNK were not significantly affected. However, peptide tolerization affected in Tregs the activity of the MAPK p38, whose phosphorylation was reduced by tolerance. The pharmacologic inhibition of p38 with the pyridinyl imidazole inhibitor SB203580 in naive NZB/W mice reproduced in vivo the effects of peptide-induced tolerance and protected mice from lupus-like disease. Transfer experiments confirmed the role of p38 in Tregs on disease activity in the NZB/W mice. These data indicate that the modulation of p38 activity in lupus Tregs can significantly influence the disease activity. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182: 7415-7421.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available