4.2 Article

Optimization of the surfaces used to capture antibodies from single hybridomas reduces the time required for microengraving

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 340, Issue 2, Pages 164-169

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2008.10.018

Keywords

Protein microarrays; Monoclonal antibodies; Soft lithography; Hybridomas; Antibody assays

Funding

  1. Eli
  2. Edythe L. Broad Institute
  3. National Academies Keck Futures Initiative
  4. NSF
  5. NSERC postgraduate fellow

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The most common method for the generation of monoclonal antibodies involves the identification and isolation of hybridomas from polyclonal populations. The discovery of new antibodies for biochemical and immunohistochemical assays in a rapid and efficient manner, however, remains a challenge. Here, a series of experiments are described that realize significant improvements to an approach for screening large numbers of single cells to identify antigen-specific monoclonal antibodies in a high-throughput manner (10(5)-10(6) cells in less than 12 h). The soft lithographic process called microengraving yields microarrays of monoclonal antibodies that can be correlated to individual hybridomas; the cells can then be retrieved and expanded to establish new cell lines. The factors examined here included the glass slide used for the microarray, the buffer used to deposit capture antibodies onto the glass, the type of polyclonal antibodies used to capture the secreted antibodies. and the time required for microengraving. Compared to earlier reports of this method, these studies resulted in increased signal-to-noise ratios for individual elements in the microarrays produced, and a considerable decrease in the time required to produce one microarray from a set of cells (from 2-4 h to 3-10 min). These technical advances will improve the throughput and reduce the costs for this alternative to traditional screening by limiting serial dilution. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available