4.8 Article

Revisiting energy consumption and GDP causality: Importance of a priori hypothesis testing, disaggregated data, and heterogeneous panels

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages 44-55

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.036

Keywords

Energy consumption; Economic growth; Panel Granger causality; Heterogeneous panels; Developed and developing countries; Cross-sectional dependence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper disaggregates energy consumption and GDP data according to end-use to analyze a broad number of developed and developing countries grouped in panels by similar characteristics. Panel long-run causality is assessed with a relatively under-utilized approach recommend by Canning and Pedroni (2008) [1]. We examine (i) reduced form production function models for both the industry and service/commercial sectors, where aggregate energy consumption is expected to cause aggregate output; and (ii) reduced form demand models, where income is expected to cause (separately) per capita residential electricity consumption and per capita gasoline consumption. We uncover for 12 different panels a set of super-consistent causality findings across two demand models that income Granger-causes per capita consumption. By contrast, the results from the production function models suggest that a different modeling framework is required to glean new, useful insights. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available