4.7 Article

Heterogeneous soil water flow and macropores described with combined tracers of dye and iodine

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 397, Issue 1-2, Pages 105-117

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.037

Keywords

Macropore; Dye tracer; Iodine-starch staining; Flow heterogeneity

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51039007, 50779080]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. 973 Project of the National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB42880204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objectives of this study were to examine applicability of the iodine-starch method to visualize heterogenous soil water flow and to investigate relationships between soil water heterogeneity and macropore structure vs. measurement scale as well as hydraulic boundaries. The food-grade dye pigment Brilliant Blue FCF dye and iodine-starch staining patterns were used to visualize soil macropore and soil water flow patterns, respectively. Totally 10 infiltration experiments were performed in the field, among which three were used to examine the iodine-starch method and seven were for various boundary conditions (i.e., the different initial ponding depths on the soil surface) and measurement scales (i.e., the soil surface areas covered initially by the tracer solutions). The cluster analysis method was used to distinguish preferential flow regions, while information measures were applied to quantify heterogeneity information content and complexity of macropores and flow systems. Results showed that the iodine-starch method was applicable to visualize soil water flow. Heterogeneous soil water flow contained more heterogeneity information than soil macropores. With a low infiltration amount, flow patterns were similar to the macropore patterns and controlled mainly by the macropores. As the infiltration amount increased, flow patterns were influenced by both macropores and boundary conditions. As the measurement scales increased, the preferential regions were more developed. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available