4.2 Article

A comparison of general practitioners prescribing of gluten-free foods for the treatment of coeliac disease with national prescribing guidelines

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 96-104

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12116

Keywords

coeliac disease; dermatitis herpetiformis; general practitioners; gluten-free foods; prescriptions

Funding

  1. Inverclyde Community Health & Care Partnership

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundCoeliac disease is an autoimmune disorder that is considered to affect approximately one in 100 people. In the UK, gluten-free (GF) foods can be prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) to treat this condition and there are national guidelines on the quantities of GF food an individual should receive on prescription. Information on actual prescribing behaviour by GPs, and how this compares with guideline recommendations, is scarce. The present study aimed to describe GPs prescribing practice of GF foods, within one locality in the UK, comparing this with national guidelines. MethodsA retrospective evaluation of GP electronic medical records for all patients with a gluten-sensitive enteropathy diagnosis and/or those prescribed GF food between April 2010 and March 2011 was carried out in 16 GP practices in the west of Scotland, serving a total of 85667 patients. ResultsOf 175 (0.18% of the total practice population) patients, 152 were identified with coeliac disease, eight with dermatitis herpetiformis and six with both conditions. A further nine patients received GF foods on prescriptions with no recorded diagnosis. There was a positive association between adherence to the prescribing guidelines and female sex (P<0.0001) and (for those with a recorded diagnosis) increasing age (P=0.001). There was no significant association between either socio-economic deprivation or co-morbidities and adherence to the prescribing guidelines. ConclusionsThere was significant under prescribing of GF foods in those identified. Further research is required to establish whether these results are representative of wider practice in the UK.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available