4.4 Article

Mutation spectrum of MMACHC in Chinese patients with combined methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 55, Issue 9, Pages 621-626

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2010.81

Keywords

cblC; Chinese; founder; methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria; MMACHC

Funding

  1. National Health Research Institutes
  2. Bureau of Health Promotion, Department of Health, Taiwan, Republic of China [DOH94-HP-2204, DOH95-HP-2206]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cblC type of combined methylmalonic aciduria (MMA) and homocystinuria (HC) is the most common inborn error of vitamin B-12 metabolism and is caused by mutations in the MMACHC gene. To elucidate the spectrum of mutations that causes combined MMA and HC in Chinese patients, the MMACHC gene was sequenced in 79 unrelated Chinese patients. Sequence analysis identified 98.1% of disease alleles and found that all patients had at least one MMACHC mutation. A total of 24 mutations were identified. Out of the 24 mutations identified, 9 were novel ones, including missense mutations (c.365A>T and c.452A>G), nonsense mutations (c.315C>G and c.615C>A), deletions (c.99delA and c.277-3_c.303del30), duplications (c.248dupT and c.626dupT) and an insertion (c.445_446insA). The c.609G4A, c.658_660delAAG, c.482G4A, c.394C4T and c.80A4G mutations were the most common mutations and accounted for 80% of disease alleles. Haplotype analysis suggests that the spread of the c.80A4G, c.609G4A and c.658_660delAAG mutations in Chinese patients were caused by a founder effect. The results indicate that defects occurring in the MMACHC gene are the major cause of this disease in Chinese patients with combined MMA and HC, and direct mutation analysis can therefore be used as a rapid confirmatory diagnosis among these Chinese patients. Journal of Human Genetics (2010) 55, 621-626; doi:10.1038/jhg.2010.81; published online 15 July 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available