4.5 Article

Effectiveness of a new decolonisation regimen for eradication of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Journal

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages 113-117

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.09.022

Keywords

Decolonisation; Eradication; Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gram-negative bacteria expressing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) have emerged worldwide. ESBL colonisation can persist for years and may favour ESBL transmission. Interventions include contact isolation precautions and restriction of antibiotic use, but decolonisation (DC) for ESBL is not established. We performed a prospective controlled open-label cohort-study from 1/2000 to 1/2008 to determine the effectiveness of a standardised DC programme. ESBL-positive patients routinely underwent screening from rectum, throat, and urine. DC included: chlorhexidine 0.2% mouth rinse three times daily (throat colonisation), paromomycin 4 x 1 g daily (intestinal colonisation), and oral antibiotics for urinary tract colonisation. ESBL elimination was defined as >= 1 set of negative follow-up screenings (throat, rectal, urine). Of 100 enrolled patients, 83% of patients were infected and 17% colonised with ESBL. Escherichia coli (71%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (25%) were the most frequent pathogens. Overall, 76% (76/100) of patients became negative for ESBL at follow-up. Fifty-five percent (42/76) of the successfully treated patients received systemic treatment for infection. Of those who completed DC, 83% (15/18) were free of ESBL at follow-up. DC success correlated with the number of risk factors and colonised sites. DC may be beneficial in a selected group of patients, potentially shortening duration of ESBL colonisation and subsequently reducing the risk for transmission. (C) 2010 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available