4.8 Article

Safety and efficacy of protease inhibitors to treat hepatitis C after liver transplantation: A multicenter experience

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages 78-86

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.08.018

Keywords

Boceprevir; Drug-drug interaction; Early virological response; HCV recurrence; Liver transplantation; Protease inhibitors; Sustained virological response; Telaprevir

Funding

  1. B. Roche
  2. Novartis
  3. Astellas
  4. Roche
  5. MSD
  6. GSK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: Protease inhibitors (PI) with peginterferon/ribavirin have significantly improved SVR rates in HCV G1 patients. Their use to treat HCV recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) is a challenge. Methods: This cohort study included 37 liver transplant recipients (male, 92%, age 57 +/- 11 years), treated with boceprevir (n = 18) or telaprevir (n = 19). The indication for therapy was HCV recurrence (fibrosis stage >= F2 (n = 31, 83%) or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (n = 6, 16%). Results: Eighteen patients were treatment-naive, five were relapsers and fourteen were non-responders to dual therapy after LT. Twenty-two patients received cyclosporine and fifteen tacrolimus. After 12 weeks of PI therapy, a complete virological response was obtained in 89% of patients treated with boceprevir, and 58% with telaprevir (p = 0.06). The end of treatment virological response rate was 72% (13/18) in the boceprevir group and 40% (4/10) in the telaprevir group (p = 0.125). A sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation was observed in 20% (1/5) and 71% (5/7) of patients in the telaprevir and boceprevir groups, respectively (p = 0.24). Treatment was discontinued in sixteen patients (treatment failures (n = 11), adverse events (n = 5)). Infections occurred in ten patients (27%), with three fatal outcomes (8%). The most common adverse effect was anemia (n = 34, 92%), treated with erythropoietin and/or a ribavirin dose reduction; thirteen patients (35%) received red blood cell transfusions. The cyclosporine dose was reduced by 1.8 +/- 1.1-fold and 3.4 +/- 1.0-fold with boceprevir and telaprevir, respectively. The tacrolimus dose was reduced by 5.2 +/- 1.5-fold with boceprevir and 23.8 +/- 18.2-fold with telaprevir. Conclusions: Our results suggest that triple therapy is effective in LT recipients, particularly those experiencing a severe recurrence. The occurrence of anemia and drug-drug interactions, and the risk of infections require close monitoring. (C) 2013 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available