4.8 Article

Detection of minimal hepatic encephalopathy: Normalization and optimization of the Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score. A neuropsychological and quantified EEG study

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages 346-353

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.04.022

Keywords

minimal hepatic encephalopathy; mild cognitive impairment; psychometric tests; spectral EEG; liver cirrhosis

Funding

  1. 60% MURS grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score (PHES) and EEG are used to detect minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE). We aimed at standardizing PHES in Italy and comparing Italian, German and Spanish norms in EEG characterized cirrhotic patients. Methods: PHES was standardized on 228 normal individuals. Repeatability was studied in 128 individuals. One hundred patients with liver cirrhosis underwent EEG and PHES which was computed on the Spanish, German and the Italian norms. Results: Age and education levels were predictors of psychometric tests; therefore, adjusted Z scores were calculated. Practice effect (p < 0.01) was detected. In the patients, the Italian norms were closer to the Spanish norms (difference -0.14 +/- 1.32, p = 0.29) than to the Germans ones (difference 1.97 +/- 2.07, p < 0.001). The PHES calculated on the Italian norms was correlated with the EEG mean dominant frequency more closely than the ones calculated on the German and Spanish norms (r = 0.38, r = 0.31, r = 0.33, respectively - p < 0.01). The detection of MHE on the basis of PHES and EEG showed limited agreement (73%, Cohen's K = 0.32). Conclusions: (i) Valid norms for PHES were produced, (ii) clues for the use of common norms in Latin Countries were found, (iii) different findings between PHES and EEG possibly reflect various features of MHE. (C) 2008 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available