4.7 Article

Electroacupuncture for thalidomide/bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma: a feasibility study

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1756-8722-7-41

Keywords

Acupuncture; Myeloma; Chemotherapy; Peripheral neuropathy; Integrative medicine

Funding

  1. Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc
  2. Marvin Kimmel Research Funds at MD Anderson Cancer Center
  3. National Cancer Institute [P50 CA142509, U10 CA032102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This single-arm study evaluated feasibility, safety, and initial efficacy of electroacupuncture for thalidomide/bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) in cancer patients with multiple myeloma. Methods: Patients with neuropathy >= grade 2 received 20 acupuncture treatments over 9 weeks. Results: For the 19 evaluable patients, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecological Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG/NTX) mean (SD) scores improved significantly between baseline and week 13 (20.8 [9.6] vs 13.2 [8.5], p = 0.0002). Moderate effect size differences began on week 4, with the largest effect size differences found at week 9 for FACT/GOG/NTX scores, worst pain in the last 24 hours, and pain severity (Cohen's d = 1.43, 1.19, and 1.08, respectively) and continuing through week 13 (Cohen's d = 0.86, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively). From baseline to week 13, additional significant improvements were seen as follows: postural stability (1.0 [0.6] vs 0.8 [0.4], p = 0.02); coin test (10.0 [7.4] vs 5.6 [1.9], p < 0.0001); button test (96.1 [144.4] vs 54.9 [47.3], p < 0.0001); and walking test (21.6 [10.0] vs 17.2 [7.7], p = 0.0003). No significant changes were seen with NCS. Conclusions: Acupuncture may help patients experiencing thalidomide- or bortezomib-induced PN. Larger, randomized, clinical trials are needed. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00891618.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available