4.3 Article

Predictors of Outcome After Treatment of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 109-116

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182860506

Keywords

mild traumatic brain injury; outcome measurement; rehabilitation

Funding

  1. Campbell Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine factors affecting outcome of comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation of individuals who sustained a mild traumatic brain injury. Participants: From a 4-year series of referrals, 49 nonconsecutive participants met criteria for mild traumatic brain injury (ie, loss of consciousness <30 minutes, Glasgow Coma Scale score >12). Setting: Outpatient, community-based postconcussion clinic at a rehabilitation hospital. Main Measures: Participants and therapy staff completed the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-Fourth Edition (MPAI-4) at the initiation and conclusion of treatment. Participants were also administered the Trail Making Test at the start of treatment. Results: Participants generally gave poorer adaptability ratings than staff at the beginning and discharge of treatment. Regression analyses revealed that after controlling for baseline ratings, psychiatric history was associated with worse participant-rated MPAI-4 Adjustment scores at treatment discharge, whereas better Trail Making Test Part B performance at initiation of treatment predicted better participant-rated MPAI-4 Ability at treatment discharge. Conclusions: Premorbid demographic and baseline neurocognitive factors should be taken into account prior to comprehensive treatment of mild traumatic brain injury, as they can influence long-term outcomes. Adaptability ratings from both staff and participants can be useful in gaining different perspectives and assessing factors affecting recovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available