4.3 Article

Long-Term Survival After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Population-Based Analysis Controlled for Nonhead Trauma

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages E1-E8

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e318280d3e6

Keywords

epidemiology; risk; mortality; rehabilitation

Funding

  1. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research [H133A020507, H133A070013]
  2. National Institute of Health [HD-07447]
  3. Rochester Epidemiology Project (from the National Institute on Aging) [R01 AG034676]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the contribution of cooccurring nonhead injuries to hazard of death after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Participants: A random sample of Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with confirmed TBI from 1987 through 1999 was identified. Design: Each case was assigned an age- and sex-matched, non-TBI regular control from the population. For special cases with accompanying nonhead injuries, 2 matched special controls with nonhead injuries of similar severity were assigned. Measures: Vital status was followed from baseline (ie, injury date for cases, comparable dates for controls) through 2008. Cases were compared first with regular controls and second with regular or special controls, depending on case type. Results: In total, 1257 cases were identified (including 221 special cases). For both cases versus regular controls and cases versus regular or special controls, the hazard ratio was increased from baseline to 6 months (10.82 [2.86-40.89] and 7.13 [3.10-16.39], respectively) and from baseline through study end (2.92 [1.74-4.91] and 1.48 [1.09-2.02], respectively). Among 6-month survivors, the hazard ratio was increased for cases versus regular controls (1.43 [1.06-2.15]) but not for cases versus regular or special controls (1.05 [0.80-1.38]). Conclusions: Among 6-month survivors, accounting for nonhead injuries resulted in a nonsignificant effect of TBI on long-term mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available