4.7 Article

Robust electrochemical analysis of As(III) integrating with interference tests: A case study in groundwater

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 278, Issue -, Pages 66-74

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.094

Keywords

As(III) detection; Electrochemical stripping; Groundwater; Au microwire electrode

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB933700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61102013, 21073197]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China [863]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Togtoh region of Inner Mongolia, northern China, groundwater encountered high concentrations As contamination (greater than 50 mu g L-1) causes an increasing concern. This work demonstrates an electrochemical protocol for robust (efficient and accurate) determination of As(III) in Togtoh water samples using Au microwire electrode without the need of pretreatment or clean-up steps. Considering the complicated conditions of Togtoh water, the efficiency of Au microwire electrode was systematically evaluated by a series of interference tests,,stability and reproducibility measurements. No obvious interference on the determination of As(III) was observed. Especially, the influence of humic acid (HA) was intensively investigated. Electrode stability was also observed with long-term measurements (70 days) in Togtoh water solution and under different temperatures (0-35 degrees C). Excellent reproducibility (RSD:1.28%) was observed from different batches of Au microwire electrodes. The results obtained at Au microwire electrode were comparable to that obtained by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES), indicating a good accuracy. These evaluations (efficiency, robustness, and accuracy) demonstrated that the Au microwire electrode was able to determine As(III) in application to real environmental samples. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available