4.7 Article

Liquid phase microextraction and ultratrace determination of cadmium by modified graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 165, Issue 1-3, Pages 200-205

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.099

Keywords

Liquid phase microextraction; Preconcentration; Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry; Cadmium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A powerful microextraction technique was used for determination of cadmium in water samples using liquid phase microextraction (LPME) followed by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GF-AAS). In a preconcentration step, cadmium was extracted from a 2 ml of its aqueous sample in the pH 7 as 5,7-dibromoquinoline-8-ol (DBQ) complex into a 4 mu l drop of benzyl alcohol. After extraction, the micro drop was retracted and directly transferred into a graphite tube modified by [W.Rh.Pd](c). Some effective parameters on extraction and complex formation, such as type and volume of organic solvent, pH, concentration of chelating agent, extraction time and stirring rate were optimized. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factor and recovery were 450% and 90%, respectively. The calibration graph was linear in the range of 0.008-1 mu g L(-1) with correlation coefficient of 0.9961 under the optimum conditions of the recommended procedure. The detection limit based on the 3Sb criterion was 0.0035 mu g L(-1) and relative standard deviation (RSD) for eight replicate measurement of 0.1 mu g L(-1) and 0.4 mu g L(-1) cadmium was 5.2% and 4.5%, respectively. The characteristic concentration was 0.0032 mu g L(-1) equivalent to a characteristic mass of 12.8 fg. In order to evaluate the accuracy and recovery of the presented method the procedure was applied to the analysis of reference materials and seawater. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available