4.7 Article

Factor space differentiation of brick clays according to mineral content: Prediction of final brick product quality

Journal

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages 108-114

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.07.030

Keywords

Brick clay; Minerals content; Prediction of quality; Principal component analyses; Mathematical modeling

Funding

  1. Serbian Ministry of Science and Technological Development [III450080, TR31055]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemical composition and XRD qualitative analysis were used to calculate mineral contents of 139 brick clay raw materials using LPNORM. The second order polynomial models (SOP) for all the samples, which express the relation between mineral contents and the characteristics of fired laboratory products, did not fit to experimental data satisfactorily, due to low coefficients of determination (r(2)). In order to improve the models, the samples are divided into four groups in factor space (four quadrants), according to their mineral content similarity, using principal component analysis (PCA). Predictive models of compressive strength (CS), water absorption (WA), firing shrinkage (FS), weight loss during firing (WLF) and volume mass of cubes (VMC) are obtained for each of the groups. Second order polynomial (SOP) models are developed, and the influence of certain minerals to brick clay bricks quality within the groups is discussed. Developed models were able to predict the final quality of products in a wide range of mineral content and temperature treatment data, showing coefficient of determination (r(2)) in range between 0.704-0.995. In order to estimate the adequacy of these models, the results were applied to the experimental data and compared according to additional statistical tests, so the next values are determined: coefficients of determination, reduced chi-square (chi(2)), mean bias error (MBE), mean percent error (MPE) and root mean square error (RMSE). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available