Journal
JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 356-364Publisher
HANLEY & BELFUS-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2011.06.003
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- American Society of Hand Therapists
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The design used in this study was a prospective cohort. Pain intensity levels recorded by the digital version of the visual analog scale (VAS-D) are easy to both score and share with other health care professionals. The purpose of the study was to examine the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and responsiveness of the VAS-D. Thirty-three people with upper extremity injuries reported pain intensity levels before and after performing four maximal grip contractions (pre- and postgripping). Our version of the VAS-D had high test-retest reliability (r = 0.96) and good concurrent validity (r = 0.84-0.97) with both the paper version of the VAS (VAS-P) and the verbal numerical rating scale (NRS-V). Responsiveness of the VAS-D was indicated by a significant increase in pain levels from pre- to postgripping. Similar responsiveness to that of the VAS-P and NRS-V was indicated by similar effect size coefficients and analysis of variance of pain change scores. In conclusion, the VAS-D is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of pain intensity for people with upper extremity injuries. However, differences in accuracy (resolution) among the VAS-D, VAS-P, or NRS-V may render the three pain scales not fully compatible. Level of Evidence: Not applicable. J HAND THER. 2011;24:356-64.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available