4.4 Article

New shortwave infrared albedo measurements for snow specific surface area retrieval

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 211, Pages 941-952

Publisher

INT GLACIOL SOC
DOI: 10.3189/2012JoG11J248

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation (NSF) grant [OPP-0821056]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Canadian Polar Continental Shelf Program (Barnes Ice Cap field campaign)
  4. Environment Canada
  5. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France
  6. Institut Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV
  7. French Polar Institute)
  8. Programme International de Collaboration Scientifique (PICS) of CNRS
  9. Ministere des Relations Internationales du Quebec
  10. Ministere des Affaires Etrangeres et Europeennes de la Republique Francaise (Consulat General de France a Quebec) in the framework of the 63e Session de la Commission Permanente de Cooperation Franco-Quebecoise

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Snow grain-size characterization, its vertical and temporal evolution is a key parameter for the improvement and validation of snow and radiative transfer models (optical and microwave) as well as for remote-sensing retrieval methods. We describe two optical methods, one active and one passive shortwave infrared, for field determination of the specific surface area (SSA) of snow grains. We present a new shortwave infrared (SWIR) camera approach. This new method is compared with a SWIR laser-based system measuring snow albedo with an integrating sphere (Infra Red Integrating Sphere (IRIS)). Good accuracy (10%) and reproducibility in SSA measurements are obtained using the IRIS system on snow samples having densities greater than 200 kg m(-3), validated against X-ray microtomography measurements. The SWIRcam approach shows improved sensitivity to snow SSA when compared to a near-infrared camera, giving a better contrast of the snow stratigraphy in a snow pit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available