4.3 Article

Iron speciation and mixing in single aerosol particles from the Asian continental outflow

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011JD016746

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's Atmospheric System Research
  2. Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  3. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  4. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  6. U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute [DE-AC06-76RL0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioavailable iron from atmospheric aerosol is an essential nutrient that can control oceanic productivity, thereby impacting the global carbon budget and climate. Particles collected on Okinawa Island during an atmospheric pollution transport event from China were analyzed using complementary single particle techniques to determine the iron source and speciation. Comparing the chemical composition and spatial distribution of iron within ambient particles and standard Asian mineral dust, it was determined that field-collected atmospheric Fe-containing particles have numerous sources, especially anthropogenic sources such as coal combustion. Fe-containing particles were found to be internally mixed with secondary species such as sulfate, soot, and organic carbon. The mass weighted average Fe(II) fraction (defined as Fe(II)/[Fe(II) + Fe(III)]) was determined to be 0.33 +/- 0.08. Within the experimental uncertainty, this value lies close to the range of 0.26-0.30 determined for representative Asian mineral dust. Previous studies have indicated that the solubility of iron from combustion is much higher than that from mineral dust. Therefore, chemical and/or physical differences other than oxidation state may help explain the higher solubility of iron in atmospheric particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available