4.3 Article

A case study of observations of volcanic ash from the Eyjafjallajokull eruption: 1. In situ airborne observations

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011JD016688

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [ncas10007, ncas10006, ncas10003] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. NERC [ncas10007, ncas10003, ncas10006] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On 17 May 2010, the FAAM BAe-146 aircraft made remote and in situ measurements of the volcanic ash cloud from Eyjafjallajokull over the southern North Sea. The Falcon 20E aircraft operated by Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) also sampled the ash cloud on the same day. While no wingtip-to-wingtip co-ordination was performed, the proximity of the two aircraft allows worthwhile comparisons. Despite the high degree of inhomogeneity (e. g., column ash loadings varied by a factor of three over similar to 100 km) the range of ash mass concentrations and the ratios between volcanic ash mass and concentrations of SO2, O-3 and CO were consistent between the two aircraft and within expected instrumental uncertainties. The data show strong correlations between ash mass, SO2 concentration and aerosol scattering with the FAAM BAe-146 data providing a specific extinction coefficient of 0.6-0.8 m(2) g(-1). There were significant differences in the observed ash size distribution with FAAM BAe-146 data showing a peak in the mass at similar to 3.5 mu m (volume-equivalent diameter) and DLR data peaking at similar to 10 mu m. Differences could not be accounted for by refractive index and shape assumptions alone. The aircraft in situ and lidar data suggest peak ash concentrations of 500-800 mu g m(-3) with a factor of two uncertainty. Comparing the location of ash observations with the ash dispersion model output highlights differences that demonstrate the difficulties in forecasting such events and the essential nature of validating models using high quality observational data from platforms such as the FAAM BAe-146 and the DLR Falcon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available