4.3 Article

Pi1B pulsations as a possible driver of Alfvenic aurora at substorm onset

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2010JA015776

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA [NAG5-11528, NAG5-12590]
  2. NSF [ANT-0838917, ANT-0840133, ANT-0839938, ANT-0838910]
  3. International Space Science Institute in Bern, Switzerland
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [0839938, 0838910] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ground-based observations have shown Pi1B magnetic pulsations are associated with substorm onset. These pulsations can also be observed at geosynchronous orbit, suggesting that they propagate from (or beyond) geosynchronous orbit to the ionosphere at substorm onset. Independently, investigations have shown that the initial brightening of an arc at subtorm onset is Alfvenic in nature (i.e., that the aurora during the initial brightening is wave-driven). These results raise the question of whether Pi1B pulsations might drive Alfvenic aurora at substorm onset. In this paper, data from a single event are presented that show Pi1B pulsations observed simultaneously at geosynchronous orbit, by FAST just above the ionosphere and by various ground stations. The event is observed by FAST within a few minutes of the onset of Pi1B pulsations, with an electron signature of the onset arc that is quite characteristic of Alfvenic aurora, showing that at least a portion of the initial brightening is wave-driven and associating this with the presence of Pi1B pulsations. The implication of this work is that Pi1B pulsations propagate to the ionosphere from beyond geosynchronous orbit and provide the wave power to drive Alfvenic aurora at substorm onset, at least for this single, isolated event. The luminosity associated with the Alfvenic aurora, however, may only provide a small contribution to the total brightness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available