4.4 Article

Chemical Composition and Tectonic Setting of Chromian Spinels from the Ediacaran-Early Paleozoic Nama Group, Namibia

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY
Volume 117, Issue 3, Pages 325-341

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/597366

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Johannesburg [UJ]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Petrographic and chemical characterization of chromian spinels from the lower and upper Schwarzrand Subgroup and the upper Fish River Subgroup of the latest Ediacaran to early Paleozoic Nama foreland basin in Namibia is used to infer the tectonic setting of source rocks and evaluate the geotectonic evolution of the Damara Orogen. Electron microprobe analysis of detrital chromian spinels from the Nama Group show three groups of chromian spinels: (i) a group with a Cr# (Cr/(Cr + Al) atomic ratio) between 0.62 and 0.75 and about 0.9% TiO2, which suggest derivation Cr/(Cr + Al from a volcanic island arc (Niederhagen and Niep members); (ii) a group with a Cr# between 0.75 and 0.88 and TiO2 well below 0.4%, which could be associated with boninitic magmas (Niederhagen, Niep, and Haribes/Rosenhof members); and (iii) a group that displays characteristics of a mid-ocean ridge basalt source, with a Cr# around 0.3 and TiO2 below 0.5% (Haribes and Rosenhof members). Paleocurrent analyses of the chromian spinel-bearing sand-stones of the Nama Basin point to a source area located in the Damara Belt. The chromian spinel petrography and chemistry do not match those of a source from the Paleo-Mesoproterozoic basement. Although a western provenance for the lower Nama Group is not supported by paleocurrents, the Gariep Belt probably acted as a source by reworking at the final stage of the foreland deposits of the Nama Group. Thus, the existing data favor a provenance from the Damara Orogen and indirectly support the tectonic models that argue for an active continental margin on the northern and western borders of the Kalahari Craton.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available