4.7 Article

Coevolution study of mitochondria respiratory chain proteins: Toward the understanding of proteine-protein interaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 201-207

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2011.04.003

Keywords

Coevolution; Respiratory chain proteins; Mirror tree method; Supercomplex; Proteine-protein interaction

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [31071163]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2010CB126604]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coevolution can be seen as the interdependency between evolutionary histories. In the context of protein evolution, functional correlation proteins are ever-present coordinated evolutionary characters without disruption of organismal integrity. As to complex system, there are two forms of proteine-protein interactions in vivo, which refer to inter-complex interaction and intra-complex interaction. In this paper, we studied the difference of coevolution characters between inter-complex interaction and intra-complex interaction using Mirror tree method on the respiratory chain (RC) proteins. We divided the correlation coefficients of every pairwise RC proteins into two groups corresponding to the binary proteine-protein interaction in intra-complex and the binary proteine-protein interaction in inter-complex, respectively. A dramatical discrepancy is detected between the coevolution characters of the two sets of protein interactions (Wilcoxon test, p-value 4.4 x 10(-6)). Our finding reveals some critical information on coevolutionary study and assists the mechanical investigation of proteine-protein interaction. Furthermore, the results also provide some unique clue for supramolecular organization of protein complexes in the mitochondrial inner membrane. More detailed binding sites map and genome information of nuclear encoded RC proteins will be extraordinary valuable for the further mitochondria dynamics study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available