4.1 Review

Modifiers and mechanisms of multi-system polyglutamine neurodegenerative disorders: lessons from fly models

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENETICS
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages 497-526

Publisher

INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1007/s12041-010-0072-4

Keywords

neurodegeneration; triplet repeat expansion; Hsp; chaperones; proteasome; hsr omega

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST)
  2. Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Govt. of India, New Delhi
  3. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyglutamine (polyQ) diseases, resulting from a dynamic expansion of glutamine repeats in a polypeptide, are a class of genetically inherited late onset neurodegenerative disorders which, despite expression of the mutated gene widely in brain and other tissues, affect defined subpopulations of neurons in a disease-specific manner. We briefly review the different polyQ-expansion-induced neurodegenerative disorders and the advantages of modelling them in Drosophila. Studies using the fly models have successfully identified a variety of genetic modifiers and have helped in understanding some of the molecular events that follow expression of the abnormal polyQ proteins. Expression of the mutant polyQ proteins causes, as a consequence of intra-cellular and inter-cellular networking, mis-regulation at multiple steps like transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulations, cell signalling, protein quality control systems (protein folding and degradation networks), axonal transport machinery etc., in the sensitive neurons, resulting ultimately in their death. The diversity of genetic modifiers of polyQ toxicity identified through extensive genetic screens in fly and other models clearly reflects a complex network effect of the presence of the mutated protein. Such network effects pose a major challenge for therapeutic applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available