4.6 Article

Physicians, Social Media, and Conflict of Interest

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 299-303

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2251-x

Keywords

professionalism; ethics; internet; conflict of interest; blogging; social media

Funding

  1. Greenwall Post-doctoral Fellowship in Bioethics and Health Policy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physicians and patients increasingly use social media technologies, such as Facebook, Twitter, and weblogs (blogs), both professionally and personally. Amidst recent reports of physician misbehavior online, as well as concerns about social media's potential negative effect on trust in the medical profession, several national-level physician organizations have created professional guidelines on social media use by physicians. Missing from these guidelines is adequate attention to conflict of interest. Some guidelines do not explicitly mention conflict of interest; others recommend only disclosure. Recommending disclosure fails to appreciate the unique features of social media that make adequate disclosure difficult to accomplish. Moreover, in emphasizing disclosure alone, current guidelines are inconsistent with medicine's general trend toward management or elimination, not just disclosure, of potential conflicts. Because social media sites typically rely on physicians' voluntary compliance with professional norms, physicians necessarily play a major role in shaping these norms' content and scope. To achieve the benefits of social media and ensure the veracity of social media content while preserving trust in the profession, physicians must reaffirm their commitment to disclose potential conflicts; advocate for better electronic disclosure mechanisms; and develop concrete management strategies-including, where necessary, the elimination of conflicts altogether.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Guiding Choice - Ethically Influencing Referrals in ACOs

Matthew DeCamp, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2015)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Navigating Ethical Tensions in High-Value Care Education

Matthew DeCamp, Kevin R. Riggs

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2016)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Physicians' perspectives regarding pragmatic clinical trials

Rachel Topazian, Juli Bollinger, Kevin P. Weinfurt, Rachel Dvoskin, Debra Mathews, Kathleen Brelsford, Matthew DeCamp, Jeremy Sugarman

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH (2016)

Article Ethics

Ethics and high-value care

Matthew DeCamp, Jon C. Tilburt

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2017)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Regional cost and experience, not size or hospital inclusion, helps predict ACO success

John Schulz, Matthew DeCamp, Scott A. Berkowitz

MEDICINE (2017)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Visiting Trainees in Global Settings: Host and Partner Perspectives on Desirable Competencies

William Cherniak, Emily Latham, Barbara Astle, Geoffrey Anguyo, Tessa Beaunoir, Joel Buenaventura, Matthew DeCamp, Karla Diaz, Quentin Eichbaum, Marius Hedimbi, Cat Myser, Charles Nwobu, Katherine Standish, Jessica Evert

ANNALS OF GLOBAL HEALTH (2017)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Providing Price Displays for Physicians Which Price Is Right?

Kevin R. Riggs, Matthew DeCamp

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2014)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Shared Savings in Accountable Care Organizations How to Determine Fair Distributions

Matthew DeCamp, Jeremy Sugarman, Scott Berkowitz

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2014)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Ethical Challenges for Accountable Care Organizations: A Structured Review

Matthew DeCamp, Neil J. Farber, Alexia M. Torke, Maura George, Zackary Berger, Carla C. Keirns, Lauris C. Kaldjian

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2014)

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

Ethics and Spheres of Influence in Addressing Social Determinants of Health

Matthew DeCamp, Karen DeSalvo, Elizabeth Dzeng

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2020)

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

Patient, Public, Consumer, and Community Engagement: From Consucrat to Representative Comment on The Rise of the Consucrat

Matthew DeCamp, Sarah E. Brewer, Vadim Dukhanin

Summary: Patient, public, consumer, and community (P2C2) engagement in healthcare delivery, research, and policy making is seen as an ethical obligation and increasingly a regulatory requirement globally. The concept of a consucrat, a career consumer who represents a particular group or community, can create issues when they are co-opted by an institution governing body or when institutions only listen to the same voices over time. To avoid these problems, it is important for P2C2 members to stay connected with the people they represent and to take the concept and process of representation seriously.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Physician Suicide Prevention and the Ethics and Role of a Healing Community: an American College of Physicians Policy Paper

Matthew DeCamp, Mark Levine

Summary: Physician suicide is an important global public health issue that requires multi-level prevention measures at the individual, interpersonal, community, and societal levels. The medical community has a responsibility to cultivate a culture that supports mental health and provides guidance and support for physician suicide prevention.

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2021)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Health as a Human Right: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians

Matthew DeCamp, Lois Snyder Sulmasy

Summary: The relationship between health and rights is complex, but the American College of Physicians sees health as a human right. Individual doctors and the medical profession have ethical obligations to patients, and society has a responsibility to ensure equitable access to appropriate health care. By recognizing health as a human right and promoting equitable health systems, the United States can better respect and protect the health rights of all individuals.

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Medicare Shared Savings Program: Public Reporting and Shared Savings Distributions

John Schulz, Matthew DeCamp, Scott A. Berkowitz

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE (2015)

Article Psychiatry

Ethical issues when using social media for health outside professional relationships

Matthew DeCamp

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY (2015)

No Data Available