4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Laparoscopic Repair of Giant Paraesophageal Hernia Results in Long-Term Patient Satisfaction and a Durable Repair

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages 2066-2075

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0712-7

Keywords

Laparoscopy; Hernia; hiatal; Outcome assessment (health care); Recurrence; Gastroesophageal reflux

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia (LRGPEH) is routinely performed in many centers, but high recurrence rates have led to concerns regarding this approach. We evaluate long-term recurrence rates, symptom improvement and correlation with radiographic recurrence, and risk factors for recurrence in our cohort of patients. A cohort of consecutive patients with a minimum of 5 years potential follow-up (1997-2003) post-LRGPEH was identified from a prospective database. Clinical outcomes, barium esophagram (BE), and quality-of-life (QoL) measures were obtained. Laparoscopic repair was successful in 185/187 patients. Routine clinical follow-up (median 77 months) was available for all patients. Detailed questionnaires and BE were obtained in 65% and 82% of patients. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related QoL (GERD-HRQoL) scores were excellent to good in 86.7%. BE (median 51 months) demonstrated radiographic hernia recurrence in 15% of patients, but without consistent symptom association. There was a trend toward increased risk of radiographic recurrence in patients with a history of pulmonary disease (p=0.08). Seven reoperations (4.4%) were performed for symptomatic recurrence (median 44 months postoperative). LRGPEH performed in our minimally invasive center of excellence resulted in a durable repair with a high degree of satisfaction and preservation of GERD-related QoL at a median follow-up of over 6 years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available