4.3 Article

The effects of early and intense pruning on light penetration, tree growth, and epicormic shoot dynamics in a young hybrid larch stand

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 149-160

Publisher

SPRINGER TOKYO
DOI: 10.1007/s10310-009-0167-z

Keywords

Diameter-height relationship; Epicormic shoot dynamics; Hybrid larch; Individual growth; Pruning

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [20380084, 20370014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined the effect of early and intense pruning on light intensity under the canopy, individual growth, diameter-height relationships, and epicormic shoot dynamics in young hybrid larch (Larix gmelinii var. japonica x L. kaempferi) to establish a new effective management method for hybrid larch plantations. The objective is to produce high-quality wood while reducing silviculture costs using a combination of low-density planting and early and intense pruning. In a young hybrid larch plantation, we pruned branches to two different heights (2 and 4 m above ground level) using a no-pruning treatment as a control. Although the growth rates were lower in the heavy pruning treatment (4 m above the ground level) than in other treatments in the year following pruning, when measured 4 years later, growth did not differ between treatments. The number of epicormic shoots increased in the year following pruning, as did the relative photosynthetic photon flux density (rPPFD). The number of epicormic shoots was also dependent on the size of individual trees. However, survival of epicormic shoots was not sufficiently high to be problematic for high-quality timber production. If branches are pruned carefully such that the rPPFD does not rise above 20%, the emergence of epicormic shoots can also be controlled. Our results indicate that early and intense pruning is an effective component of a new management system for hybrid larch plantations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available