4.1 Article

Small forest landowner preferences for working forest conservation contract attributes: A case of Washington State, USA

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOREST ECONOMICS
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 307-330

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2013.06.002

Keywords

Conservation contracts; Working forest conservation easements; Small forest landowners; Choice experiments; Stated preference survey; Random parameters-error components logit (RPL-EC)

Funding

  1. Rural Technology Initiative at the University of Washington's School of Forest and Environmental Sciences [WNZ-1357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Washington State, small forest landowners (SFLO) play an important role in maintaining forest cover on the landscape as well as associated ecosystem services. This paper examines landowner preferences for the attributes of working forest conservation contracts (WFCC) using a choice experiment. The attributes examined are contract duration (from 10 years to perpetuity), forest management requirements, and the extent of forestland covered under the contract. We find that contract attributes are valued very differently depending on landowner objectives and harvesting behavior. Landowner characteristics and forestland spatial characteristics including distances to development and large public forestlands were found to significantly influence the likelihood of contract acceptance. While a significant portion of preference heterogeneity remains unobserved, we identify several key sources of landowner preference heterogeneity which allows for a better understanding of which landowners are likely to enroll in voluntary forest conservation contracts and may have implications for improved targeting of contracts. (C) 2013 Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lima Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available